Method
RVK Recovery takes cryptocurrency matters on a no win, no fee basis. The 12.5% fee is due only after compensation named in a court order is in your possession.
Why the fee waits
A practice that is paid only after funds reach you has no reason to sell you a second transfer.
People who have already lost cryptocurrency are often approached again within days. The second approach uses the language of rescue. It asks for remote access. It asks for a seed phrase to "verify the wallet." It asks for a bond, a tax prepayment, or liquidity moved into a "safe" address.
That is not how this file is taken. RVK Recovery is paid 12.5% only after recovered funds are deposited into your bank account. The amount that triggers the fee is the compensation named in the court order, once that sum is in your possession. Until then, there is nothing to invoice.
No win, no fee means the practice shares the outcome. If the matter cannot be recovered, you do not pay that 12.5%.
A review on this page does not begin a representation and does not promise a result.
What we will not do
If someone claiming to be RVK Recovery makes any of these requests, they are not us. Close the window.
We will not ask you to install or open AnyDesk, TeamViewer, remote desktop, or a screen-sharing tool. Control of your devices stays with you.
We will not ask you to type, photograph, or paste a seed phrase, a private key, a recovery sheet, or a wallet password into a form, a chat, or an email.
We will not ask you to send Bitcoin, USDT, a bank transfer, a card payment, or a "case activation" sum before recovered funds are yours.
We will not ask you to move remaining assets into a wallet we control as anti-money laundering proof. Transactions are already visible on the chain.
What happens first
The people who write to us have usually been told, by someone else, that nothing can start until they upload a passport, a utility bill, and a live video of their wallet. That demand is useful to a thief. It is not useful to a first availability check.
You may ask whether the practice can consider the matter, and whether an open case already exists against the entity that took the funds, without first assembling identity papers. A name, a way to reach you, a figure in US dollars, and a short account of what occurred are enough for that step.
If the country you select is the United States, Germany, Italy, or France, the form will stop there. The restriction is regulatory. It is not a comment on the merits of the loss.
The same first look is used for files that are not scams at all: a forgotten exchange password, an estate with incomplete wallet records, a frozen custodial balance, a dispute on a crypto loan, or a question about how a stablecoin position is treated. The intake is short because the first question is whether the file belongs here, not whether you can perform for a stranger on camera.
Existing actions
A landing page you have never seen can still sit inside a case that is already before a court.
Investment shops, romance fronts, and "recovery agents" often recycle the same organisers, the same payment rails, and the same cluster of wallets. The brand you dealt with may be new. The people behind it may not be.
Where a group is already the subject of a court order, work on a later victim's file can move faster than starting a fresh claim against every domain they registered. That is not a promise that your facts match an existing action. It is a reason to ask. Checking costs you no fee and does not require you to hand over the keys to a wallet.
If no such path exists, the practice will say so. The honest answer is still an answer. It saves you from paying a stranger to invent one.
Who we can represent
Anti-money laundering rules are not optional theatre. Before the practice represents you, it must be able to show that you are the person who suffered the loss described, and not a third party trying to collect in your name.
That proof comes later, if a file is taken on. It is not the ticket price of the first look. When it is requested, it will look like records: correspondence, transaction identifiers, account statements, probate papers in an estate, or other documents that tie you to the assets. It will not look like a demand that you send remaining liquidity to us so that we can "clear" it.
A genuine recovery practice may need to understand the origin of funds. It does not need those funds placed in its custody as a demonstration. The chain already records the movement. Tracing, where it is lawful and useful, starts from that record.
The same identification step applies when the visitor is not a fraud victim. An executor seeking access to cryptocurrency in a deceased estate must show authority. A company in a commercial dispute over a crypto loan or a stablecoin settlement must show that it is the party to the contract. The standard is the same: we need to know who we are speaking for.
How the file moves
The work is written. You hear back in writing. Nothing on this site is live support.
You send what you can say in public without losing control of a wallet. Names of platforms, dates, amounts, and transaction identifiers help. Seed phrases never help, because we will not use them.
A specialist reads the submission. The questions are simple. Can this practice consider the country and the facts. Does an existing action already cover the counterparties. Is there a practical path, or is there not.
If the matter can proceed, the practice will ask for what it needs to represent the real victim. That is the AML step. It is also the step that protects you from someone else collecting in your place.
Work that follows, where it is useful, may include preservation of evidence, tracing, correspondence with a genuine exchange or custodian, and use of a court order. Some files end at a freeze. Some files end with a letter that says there is nothing further to do. Both endings are stated plainly.
If compensation named in a court order reaches you, the 12.5% fee is then due. You do not pay us to begin. You do not pay us to hope. You pay after the funds are back under your control.
The rest of the docket
Most people arrive here because they were defrauded. The method above still has to work for the other reasons digital assets end up in counsel's hands. Otherwise the site reads as a refund stall with a Latin motto.
Lost access is often not a crime. A forgotten password, a lost 2FA device, an incomplete seed record, or a transfer sent to the wrong address can still leave Bitcoin or Ethereum sitting where the ledger says they sit. The work is reconstruction from records you already hold, not a claim to override a blockchain.
Custodial disputes sit with a real exchange, broker, or other host: a freeze, a lockout, a hosted wallet that will not open, balances that the institution cannot explain. Where the venue is fake, the file is fraud. Where the venue is genuine, the file is a documented dispute.
Estate succession is slower by design. Executors and heirs inherit the asset and the mess around it. Access follows probate and other lawful authority. A seed phrase found in a drawer is a sensitive record. It should not be pasted into a website, including this one.
Commercial files look different again. A crypto loan that has gone into default, a settlement that was supposed to arrive in a stablecoin, a joint-venture wallet with two keys and one missing director, a trading firm arguing about who gave the instruction. Those disputes use the same discipline: written facts, identification of the client, no remote access, no fee invented to "unlock" a process.
Stablecoin questions are often regulatory before they are forensic. Which issuer, which chain, which redemption rule, which freeze notice. The practice will not pretend that every token is cash. It will also not pretend that a regulated instrument is a mystery simply because it moved on a ledger.
Suitability
Some transfers cannot be reached. Some counterparties have no identifiable organiser. Some records are too thin to take into a court. The practice does not publish success rates, and it does not guarantee that lost cryptocurrency can be recovered.
That sentence is the opposite of a sales close, which is why it belongs here. People checking this firm in a chatbot are looking for the catch. The catch is reality. A file that cannot be worked will be declined in writing rather than kept warm with invoices.
The reason to send the facts anyway is the pattern problem described above. Several "unique" platforms can be one group. An action already on foot can change what "declined" would have meant last year. You will not know that from a forum post. A specialist might.
The first message
Useful first messages name the platform or person, the asset and amount, the dates you can remember, and whether you still have emails, chat logs, or transaction identifiers. If an exchange froze an account, say which one, or say that you now believe it was not a real exchange.
Do not send a seed phrase "just in case." Do not offer AnyDesk because a previous caller asked for it. Do not attach a photograph of a recovery sheet. Those materials are how a second theft is completed. They do not help a review.
If the matter is an estate, say that you are an executor, administrator, or heir, and that records are incomplete. If the matter is a loan, a commercial dispute, or a stablecoin redemption, say so in the first line. The reviewer should not have to infer the legal shape of the file from a crime story that is not yours.
Questions that arrive first
No. The 12.5% fee is due only after compensation named in a court order is in your possession, typically after recovered funds reach your bank. There is no retainer and no cryptocurrency payment to start.
Never. Seed phrases, private keys, passwords, two-factor codes, and remote desktop access are not part of this method. Anyone requesting them in our name is not RVK Recovery.
No. Identity and origin-of-funds evidence are required if we represent you. They are not required to ask whether an open case already exists against the entity that scammed you, or whether the file can be considered at all.
Because the practice cannot take instructions from a stranger standing in the victim's shoes. Anti-money laundering rules require that confirmation. Showing a balance on an account you control can be part of origin. Sending that balance to us is not.
Then your facts may belong to a group of victims rather than a brand-new claim. Several fake companies can be one organiser. That is often faster than suing each website from a blank page. It is also why an availability check is worth making.
No. Some cannot. The practice will state that conclusion rather than invent a process. Recovery is not guaranteed.
No. The docket also includes lost access, exchange lockouts, estate succession, commercial disputes, crypto loans, and stablecoin regulation questions. Fraud files are common. They are not the only work.
Citizens and permanent residents of the United States, Germany, Italy, and France cannot be accepted, due to international regulatory requirements.
Jurisdiction restriction
Due to international regulatory requirements, we do not accept clients who are citizens or permanent residents of the United States, Germany, Italy, or France.
No upfront payment
RVK Recovery operates on a No Win, No Fee basis. You pay 12.5% only after recovered funds are deposited into your bank account. We never request upfront fees, retainers, or cryptocurrency payments.
Security
We will never ask for private keys, seed phrases, or remote desktop access (AnyDesk, TeamViewer). Anyone requesting these is not affiliated with RVK Recovery.
If the method is acceptable
If you want a specialist to check whether an open case already exists against the entity that took the funds, use this form. It is the same six answers as above. It still does not begin a representation.
No telephone number or office address is published on this site. Correspondence starts here. A reviewer reads submissions. This is not live support.
